Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Oliver Sylvester-Bradley's avatar

Hi Richard,

Thanks for sharing this - it's great.

However, I worry that "Build network communication channels" and "Initiate digital social network" don't appear until Phase 5.

IMHO symbiotic networks may be easier to create and more likely to survive if the network communication channels were established prior to, or alongside the in-person meetings.

All too often vast amounts of energy are wasted when conference, or event attendees dissipate after meeting face-to-face because no suitable communication channels have been established to keep the network alive. Even worse than this is the time wasted on the incessant debate about which tools to use for network communications - some people prefer email, some don’t like email, some like Slack, some prefer Telegram and then someone proposes a new forum, which fails to achieve enough adoption from members of the network that are already suffering from platform fatigue.

How can we move from siloed groups to effective symbiotic networks, without requiring people to adopt yet another platform or communication channel?

The answer is "by adopting shared protocols".

By adopting a shared protocol for group identification, discovery and progress updates network participants don’t need to change their existing ways of working, adopt another platform or even agree to use the same platform as every other group. They can stick with our existing tools, or preferred ways of working and benefit from wider dissemination of their work, easier discovery of related work of other groups, synergistic opportunities, and improved pathways to cooperation and collaboration at the same time.

As outlined in my post on Defining the DNA of collaboration https://open.coop/2019/03/07/defining-dna-collaboration/ the above could be achieved if groups adopted a simple protocol - a basic publishing format - which exposed:

- The group / organisation’s shared purpose

- A list of freeform tags describing the scope of their work

- A link to their RSS feed

These basic ingredients, which we have now encoded as part of the decentralised network protocol we call Murmurations, ( https://murmurations.network/ ) enable aggregators (i.e Group Coordinators at the network level) to aggregate member profiles, members news updates and even Offers and Wants to build ‘symbiotic networks’ around of any particular topic area, country, biome, or other kind of network.

By encouraging participants in symbiotic networking efforts to adopt shared protocols from the outset, rather than waiting until phase 5, it should be much easier to develop the long-lasting, resilient networks which we need to enable a collaborative regenerative economy.

Expand full comment
Daniel Pinkerton's avatar

This is a very cool infographic! And it's reminscient of what I attempted to do to connect the silos of my local music and arts community where I live a couple of years ago. I kind of intuited a similar approach but not nearly as fleshed out. Unfortunately I never quite got the first round of meetings together and ended up creating yet another silo of my own flavour of creative community instead!

I'm really looking forward to the book. But I'm curious about what you have shared here. Can you really connect and align a whole massive symbiotic network in just a few meetings like this? If it was this easy, couldn't any charismatic leader march into a space and become a catalytic connector? Is there something missing here? Or is it actually as easy to do as it looks on paper?

Would love to read case studies of where this has worked, what the challenges were and what the outcomes were like.

Thanks in advance!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts