Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marcus Petz's avatar

This "pruning" reminds me very much of agroforestry. Every so often a system grows weeds and some plants get too big, shading out smaller competitors. Thus in agroforestry there must be an aggressive pruning. This is similar to thinning and second thinning that you find in forestry. ONLY in forestry the aim is to remove the smaller plants and less healthy trees so that bigger timber producers will thrive and not energy wood (less valuable / useful timber is burnt rather than made into products). In agroforestry the weeds are removed, and then the larger plants are pruned, with the prunings and weedings being used for enriching the soil.

In this case you point out the rise of middle men, agencies that are not really needed and how large players can act as a monopoly or monopsony. In some ways the diversity of investors in the "not-quite-a-bank" is countering that. Yet they are not a commons / coop of villagers. So here we have a financial pruning or weeding. I think it is interesting to ask where did the weeds come from? AND how were they able to survive and grow? Also to me this is maladaptive behavior and I wonder how we might repurpose or change this situation to design out the growth of weeds in the first place. What could be a virtual mulch!? How might this rentier class be altered to gain useful livelihoods that are mutually beneficial to them and those who are being exploited- so they are served rather than taken advantage of?

Expand full comment

No posts